There (be)

Future).

Выполните тест. Письменно переведите предложения.

1. At the Customs House I ... to open my suit-case.

a) asked

b) was asked

c) am asking

2. The monitor of the group ... next week.

a) will be elected

b) was elected

c) has been elected

3. They ... since last year.

a) have been divorced

b) were divorced

c) will be divorced

4. I ... slowly down the street when somebody called me.

a)was walking

b) am walking

c) will be walking

5. After she ... she felt better.

a) had cried

b) cries

c) has cried

1) Изучите тему: простые неличные формы глагола- ParticipleI, ParticipleII.

Выполните тест .Письменно переведите предложения.

1. I felt suddenly small ...beside those immense walls of stone.

a) standing

b)stood

2. Generally ...,the problem is not so easy as it seems to be.

a) spoken

b) speaking

3. He stood for a while ... my hands.

a) holding

b) held

4. Frankly ... I can’t approve of his behaviour.

a) speaking

b) spoken

5. He will certainly come if ...

a) asked

b)asking

3. Изучите тему : модальные глаголы и их эквиваленты.

Выполните тест. Письменно переведите предложения.

1....I call you Bob?

a) May

b) Can

c) Could

2. Why are you late? You ... to have come at 10 a. m.

a) were

b) can

c) may

3. Don’t make so much noise. We ... wake the baby.

a) mustn’t

b) can’t

c) are to

4. Their son ... stay up late last night to watch the World Cup on TV.

a) could

b) was allowed to

c) had to

5. –I’ve got a terrible headache.

- You ... take an aspirin.

a) should

b) must

c) can

On the photo

Positive And
Normative Economics In studying economics it is important to distinguish two
branches of the subject. The first is known as 'positive economics', the second
as "normative economics" Positive economics deals with objective or
scientific explanations of the working of the economy. The aim of positive
economics is to explain how society makes decisions about consumption,
production, and exchange of goods. The purpose of this investigation is
twofold: to satisfy our curiosity about why the economy works as it does, and
to have some basis for predicting how the economy will respond to changes in
circumstances. Normative economics is very different. Normative economics
offers prescript ions or recommendations based on personal value judgements. In
positive economics, we hope to act as detached scientists. Whatever our
political persuasion, whatever our view about what we would like to happen or
what we would regard as 'a good thing', in the first instance we have to be
concerned with how the world actually works. At this stage, there is no scope
for personal value judgements. We are concerned with propositions of the form:
if this is changed then that will happen. In this regard, positive economics is
similar to the natural sciences such as physics, geology, or astronomy. Here
are some examples of positive good will rise. The normative question of whether
this price rise is desirable is entirely distinct. Similarly, there would be
substantial agreement that the following proposition of positive economics is
correct: favourable weather conditions will increase wheat output, reduce the
price of wheat, and increase the consumption of wheat.

Many proposi
tions in positive economics would command widespread agreement among
professional economists. Of course, as in any other science, there are
unresolved questions where disagreement remains. These disagreements are at the
frontiers of economics. Research in progress will resolve some of these issues
but new issues will arise and provide scope for further research. Although
competent and comprehensive research can in principle resolve many of the
outstanding issues in positive economics, no corresponding claim can be made
about the resolution of disagreement in normative economics. Normative
economics is based on subjective value judgements, not on the search for any
objective truth. The following statement combines positive and normative
economics: 'The elderly have very high medical expenses compared with the rest
of the population, and the government should subsidise health bills of the
aged. The first part of the proposition - the claim that the aged have
relatively high medical bills - is a statement in positive economics. It is a
statement about how the world works, and we can imagine a research programme
that could determine whether or not it is correct. Broadly speaking, this
assertion happens to be correct. The second part of the proposition - the
recommendation about what the government should do - could never be 'proved to
be correct or false by any scientific research investigation. It is simply a
subjective value judgement based on the feelings of the person making the
statement. Many people can share this subjective judgement, for example those
people who believe that all citizens alive today should be able to purchase
roughly equal amounts of luxury and recreational goods after paying for the
necessities of life. But other people might reasonably disagree. You might
believe that it is more important to devote society's scarce resources to
improving the environment.

1. There are millions of stars within our galaxy.
2. There will be a sale in this supermarket.
3. Since 1960s there has been an increasing tendency for population to move from city centers
to the countryside.

(eat)5 there," said the elder goat. Before they (can)6 (get)7 to the hill they (have to)8 (cross)9 a bridge. They (know)10 that a mean ugly troll (live)11 under the bridge but they never (see)12 him before. They also (know)13 that the troll (like)14 (fight)15. "If we (meet)16 the troll, I (fight)17 with him," said the younger goat.

explained that his house (decorate) at the moment but he (leave) the country the next day, as he(not see) his rich relative for a few years. He said he hoped his neighbour(look) after his house properly. The first week passed without any incident. Soon the decorators packed up and(leave). But the next day the good friend (catch) sight of two fellows at his neighbour's door(pack) rolled up carpets into the old van. "Hey", cried the man, "What the hell you (do)? I (look) after the house for a week already an I (not want) my friend(get) angry when he (return) home" The two fellows explained to him that the owner of that very house (order) (clean) his Persian carpets while he(be away). They managed to make him (believe)that it9be) true. The friendly man (think) that his own carpets (need) cleaning. He always (be) a bechelor and everything in his house (suffer)from his carelessness. So he (agree) with the two fellows that they (add) the expenses secretly to his neighbour's bill. The happy carpet- cleaners (lay) all the carpets into their van and(drive) cheerfully away. While they(drive) they(make) fun of the man they so cleverly(deceive). There (be) no need to say the neither of the neighbours ever(see) their carpets again.

Глаголы в нужное время, поставить необходимо:)

different objectives. 3. Every morning I (go) to my work. 4. It usually (take) me fifteen minutes to get to work. 5. I (be) a head of a human resources department in a city hall.