Задание 5 по образцу и перевод пожалуйста

Antoni Benedict from Italy.
In my view English should be taught at different levels, but not simplified. And besides, by changing the language, we are depriving the student of the real words. If the student is taught a simplified version of a language, how will he or she be able to understand authentic texts like poems, slang expressions, or lyrics? That is really no good for students!

Magda Szabo from Hungary.
We call our planet "a global village" now which means that everything is gradually becoming one grey mass: our culture, our eating habits and even the way we think. I think this means that we should keep everything that is characteristic to us and our language in first place. We should guard our own mother tongue as a precious possession and use any second language just as a way to communicate with other global citizens.

Hector Kadmos from Greece.
No language is easy to learn because they all have their own history and culture! And no language can be simplified just for the sake of easiness. By trying to make it easier, we might deform it and then, together with its complexity, much of its beauty would disappear! I think students should deal with the real language and all its complexity and be exposed to real-life language used by native speakers. This is the only way to teach learners how to manage in a real conversation.

Lea Hoffman from Germany
I know that doing business in English does not always require very good usage or even a complete understanding of the language. Why should we speak the way native speakers do when we can already understand each other? It is more important to be able to communicative and understand each other than it is to be grammatically correct. Sometimes students are taught old-fashioned phrases and vocabulary with subtle meanings and this makes it difficult for all users of English to understand each other! Students should be taught simpler English.

Peter Teller from the UK.
I don't think there is any use in simplifying a language: if we over-simplify the language we teach, it will become useless for real communication. On the other hand, if the language is too difficult to learn, not many people will be able to master it. I believe we should teach a foreign language in a manner close to how children start learning their mother tongue, and then gradually work towards the real-life language. We definitely should aim at reaching a "real" language level, otherwise there is no sense in learning it at all.

Образец:
There are some roses in the vase.
Are there any roses in the vase?
There is some wine in the glass.
Is there any wine in the glass?
1. There are some letters for Ann. 2. There is some noise (шум) in the corridor. 3. There are some children in the garden. 4. There are some cars in the street. 5. There is some fish in the fridge. 6. There is some ice-cream on the table. 7. There are some books on the shelf. 8. There are some old shoes under the bed.
Упр. 1.15. Измените предложения по образцу, употребляя отрицательное местоимение no.
Образец:
There aren't any boys there.
There are no boys there.
1. There isn't any coffee in the cup. 2. There aren't any students in the class-room. 3. There aren't any cars in the street. 4. He hasn't any friends. 5. They haven't any money. 6. We haven't any meat for supper. 7. That country hasn't any coffee to export.
Упр. 1.16. Вставьте some или any.
1. There are … students in the library. 2. There isn't … light in the room. 3. Mary has got two sisters but she hasn't got … brothers. 4. I don't like popular music but … people like it. 5. Has Mother … meat for dinner? – Yes, she has … . 6. Are there … mistakes in Nick's dictation? – No, there are not … . 7. Has Max … friends here? – Yes, he has … . 8. Has Bess … interesting books to read? – No, she hasn't … . 9. Would you like … coffee? 10. Can I have … tea, please?