"Как я вижу телевидение в будущем" сочинение на Англиском Языке

Deeply deluded those who believes journalists reflect reality or tell us about reality: they create it. No more and no less. Now think about GE, that most of us cannot imagine a life without TV, newspapers, electronic media and all that is called mass media, one of the modern kul′turologìv said that if a tree fell in the forest and no television channel did not say anything about it, then you can assume that the tree is not rushed. This is hyperbole, but, in the end, it's true. I want to write a lot about the modern press, radio, but now I will focus on television, for there is still vplivovìšogo and avtoritetnìšogo source of information in today's society. Here's the take at least news, If you happened to watch the news from different countries, and it is possible on cable or suputni-an academic television, you can notice that various news editions represent the same event differently. So naturally, you say, it's not just the difference in the method of information delivery, and hidden, but have a unique score. Yes, even the impartial official news-consciously or unconsciously, we are no longer dìšaêmos′-give its own assessment of the zobražuvanim events. This is especially true of political events: hidden light sarcasm--and one the same replica of politics with a neutral becomes very aggressive. Or St-own eyes saw-to-speaking news translate Ukrainian we would like "in an interview with the Ukrainian politician, even no matter with whom, as we grebuêm!

 

But it is in any case not a rebuke to journalists unprofessional one country: the situation is symmetric! And we're not even about politics. Looking modern cinema, the so-called masone, or commercial, every time I wonder: why does popular become, for example, Shani ekšeni, fighters or some crazy melodrama. When art movies even existed, and life zobražuvalos′ except that literature and painting, critics have repeated: the work of art is vartìsnim, which depicts the human psychology and the reader gets to know itself? Someone will recognize themselves in the characters of another blockbuster, where absolutely devoid of individual traits of new moon rìgaê with guns, where no doubt, no thought, no psychology? Does anyone ipìznaê themselves in the Latin-American TV series, where not even the raging passion and ìkas′ nevmogivovana hysteria and solid atonia human instincts-not would venture to call their feelings? Do not know ...